Don't be afraid to go streaking!

The Krewe isn't afraid this week as we dive into the stories you're not hearing in the news. 

From Tulsi Gabbard's release of docs revealing Fauci's role in Covid to the Media not reporting it, USAID money paying for Biden's Campaign and yes..even HEMPCRETE, the Krewe is on it this week.

Don't miss this episode as we get to partake of Cigars while we sip a Maker's Mark pick from Dorignac's in Metairie...

Like, share, follow "Implicit Bias Radio!"

Transcript

SPEAKER_00 0:00

It is hot outside. The AC is down in the TSPL. So we are doing this show al fresco, which means we are going streaking on this week's episode of Implicit Bias Radio. That's right, folks. Welcome back to the Implicit Bias Radio show, where this week we are taking a page straight out of old school. You know, Frank the Tank hammered out of his mind, hauling his Sasquatch-sized rear end buck naked across campus, like it was the most natural thing in the world. That man was not afraid, and neither are we. Not one bit. So if Frank can do it without a second thought, then neither are we right here on Implicit Bias Radio. Charging in raw, no filter, no fear. Though between you and me, with the dad bod, like if I tried to do this in real life, I'd probably pull a hamstring, flash half the city, and end up in a very uncomfortable group text with the sheriff's department. Yeah. We like to talk big, but we still suck in the big gut when we walk past a mirror. Welcome to the show. This is Implicit Bias Radio. And look, we've got to be honest with you on this week's show. Fear does really kind of have a way of turning us all into complete idiots. I mean, it doesn't just knock at the door a lot of times. It kicks the door in wearing muddy boots and tracking anxiety everywhere. One minute we're a rational adult. The next we're sweating like Brian Fantana when he put on Sex Panther and realized that 60% of the time it works 100% of the time. Palm slick, brain offline, saying stuff you'd never admit to in the daylight. We've all been there more times than we care to count. I mean, heck, just last week, you know, I almost talked myself out of recording this episode because I thought, well, you know, what if everybody hates it? What if, what if I say something stupid and inappropriate? Again, newsflash. I probably will. It's kind of the brand here on Implicit Bias Radio. That's the point. We mix whiskey, we mix scripture with just enough bad judgment to keep the FCC on speed dial. Remember, Peter, by the way, you know, big tough fisherman walking on water with Jesus one day, then denying the man three times before the rooster even clears its throat. That's fear for you. It makes you a ghost of your own faith faster than, you know, maybe I ghost the gym after leg day. And don't act like you haven't done it too. That job interview where, you know, we suddenly forgot our own name, that family dinner where we smiled and nodded while our crazy uncle went off another rant, or God forbid, public speaking, you know, people don't like necessarily doing that. Your heart's doing jumping jacks, your mouth goes drier than a Baptist's unhidden liquor cabinet, and suddenly we're making choices that are bad, right? Those choices make about as much sense as bringing a glass wall to a dodgeball game. Yeah, that they'll never see me behind this see-through wall. Well, spoiler alert, they see you. They always see you. And usually they see us with their phones out. But here's the part that hits us kind of right in the gut every single time. Jesus actually lays it out plain in the gospel, according to Matthew chapter 10, verses 26 through 33. He's sending his disciples out there into the world like lambs among wolves. And instead of a nice pep talk, he drops the truth bomb. It starts with, fear not. Then he continues, so do not be afraid of them, for there is nothing concealed that will not be disclosed, or hidden that will not be made known. What I tell you in the dark, speak in the daylight. What I whispered in your ear, proclaim from the roofs. Do not be afraid of those who kill the body, but cannot kill the soul. That's kind of heavy, isn't it? Jesus isn't just saying don't be scared. He's saying the worst the world can do is temporarily hurt you. But hiding the truth, that's the real danger. Fear wants you to believe one awkward moment or bold stand ruins everything. It sells you this whole dramatic trailer in your head where you're the villain in your own story. It's like thinking that Anchorman news team fight was a documentary instead of glorious, chaotic masterpiece that it actually was. Newsflash, it wasn't. And neither is the horror movie that fear keeps directing in our lives. Now, I'm not saying we should go full Frank the tank and start streaking our way through towns. That would be less bold statement and more public health hazard and therapy fundraiser than anything else. The show might get demonetized before the first ad, but that's kind of the point. Faith isn't about pretending we're fearless, it's about doing it anyway. Like David walking up to Goliath with nothing but a sling and a prayer and probably some serious internal screaming. Fear isn't just an emotion, it's actually a choice. Every time we let it drive, we're basically telling God, you know what, big guy, my anxiety looks bigger than your plan today. Where's my support animal? But what if we stopped running from it? What if we started running straight through it? What if we got a little naked with the truth, metaphorically? Please, I'm begging you, what if we refuse to let fear write the script? So this week, we're talking real stuff, laughing at ourselves, maybe even throwing in a whiskey-fueled tangent or two, because liquid courage has its place when it's chasing the real thing. So, yeah, we're going streaking on this episode. Not literally. Please don't send me your therapy bills. But we are stripping away the fear. We're gonna get honest and we're charging forward anyway. Frank wasn't just afraid. Jesus says we don't have to be. And at the end of the day, neither do you. So buckle up, laugh along, and let's do this. Cheers. A very special episode of Implicit Bias Radio this week for those watching on video. Yes, the TSPL might look a little different. It's because we're not actually in the TSPL. I mean, heck, we're not even at the actual location. We'll give you the skinny on it in just a second, but welcome back into our weekly whiskey segment of Implicit Bias Radio. I'll introduce you to the crew, then we will discuss what happened that accounts for this whole new setup. I'm your host, Kavan Bordelon. Caleb, it's great to have you back. And Caleb, I noticed that you are partaking of something we don't normally get to partake of on this week's episode.

SPEAKER_02 6:20

You talking about the breeze? No, I'm not talking about the breeze. Oh, you might be talking about a cigar.

SPEAKER_00 6:25

Talking about the Stogie that you have, which is actually kind of cool to do on Implicit Bias Radio. Speaking of the Stogies, the man who provides the Stogies is also out here outdoors with us as we bring you this episode. Renee Girard of Pipers Haven, Louisiana's only certified master tobacconist. Renee, you lived up to the CWAT moniker for this week because you did not arrive with cigars. But somehow, as if by magic, the certified wizard of tobacco produced enough cigars for everybody on the show.

SPEAKER_01 6:54

Well, you know, that's part of being a wizard. You can do that. What this is, is it's training for this weekend. Uh yes. Yeah, you know, we're you I know how you are. We have to get you used to smoking cigars again for this weekend. Caleb and I and Jonathan, we're all set. Um we're pros at this, but this is true. We got to break you in slowly.

SPEAKER_00 7:13

This is true. I I appreciate that.

SPEAKER_02 7:15

When he's out of practice like that, you gotta kind of work him back into it. That's what it is.

SPEAKER_00 7:19

Yeah, I appreciate that. And you also heard that Jonathan is here, Jonathan Bruce Art of Industrial Fabrication Services. Jonathan, great to have you back with us here on the show.

SPEAKER_03 7:27

Glad to be back.

SPEAKER_00 7:28

I was about to say you picked a week to come back, didn't you?

SPEAKER_03 7:30

Yeah, but I think I got the good seat. I won't say the hot seat, I'll say the cool seat. Okay, the cool seat. I feel the breeze coming around the corner here.

SPEAKER_00 7:37

So for our video audience and for our radio audience as well, if you hear a little background noise, we'll explain what it is for our video audience. Let's go ahead and explain exactly what happened that brought us to a completely different location for the TSPL this week, presented by Mr. Lester Steakhouse. I got a text this afternoon as we were getting ready to arrive for the show from our video producer who is when I tell you the man does yeoman's work, he is always money. Aaron David is just the man when it comes to this. And he texts me and says, Brother, I think the AC at the TSPL is out. It is 92 degrees in the building. And at the last moment, we were able to find a location that had a porch, able to set up, and that explains why the TSPL, the Mr. Lester's TSPL, today is Alfresco. We are outside. Which, man, actually, even though it's probably in the high 80s right now, as we record this episode, it's not terrible.

SPEAKER_02 8:42

No, I mean, this is actually it's not bad. I uh it reminds me when I was younger hanging out, sitting out with my grandfather on the porch or the stoop that we had. And uh and it's pretty enjoyable.

SPEAKER_01 8:51

Yeah, we get we get in a little breeze every so often, just kind of buzz through here. So it's it's nice, it's better than where we were.

SPEAKER_00 8:59

Well, it's better, yeah, better than the other location because man, at 92 degrees inside with no breeze is kind of bad.

SPEAKER_03 9:05

It reminds me of the days when uh I was young and not allowed in the house too.

SPEAKER_00 9:11

Well, trust me, I'm sure there are things that can't happen in the house like what we're doing right now, which is drinking from a hose pipe, and you know, yeah. But the upside is we do get to enjoy stogies with our whiskey, which by the way, I love when we have our weekly whiskey partners who send us bottles. And this one comes from our New Orleans weekly whiskey partner, Dornax in Metary, which man, talk about fantastic. I see Paul Sabatier, who is our audience for this week. He is our audience for this week because he's the only one. But man, this maker's mark, I'm I'm digging it already with this cigar. Caleb, you want to start us off?

SPEAKER_02 9:44

Sure, I can happily. So uh is my mic on?

SPEAKER_00 9:48

Not yet. We're waiting for it. There we go.

SPEAKER_02 9:50

Look, it's hot in there. He's straight.

SPEAKER_00 9:51

It is, and and we got to give him credit for doing everything that he's doing. We appreciate him.

SPEAKER_02 9:55

I I saw him trying to pull out his phone earlier. He was trying to hire a midget with a fan, but I don't think they did it. But on the nose, I get hot leather. Uh no, I get nice wet leather. I get hints of cinnamon roll, actually. When I say cinnamon roll, I remember, here we go. I remember I was at uh wasn't Taji. Maybe it was Taji. I was at Taji waiting, and I wanted a stupid drink and cinnamon roll because they installed it. I had a Cinnabon that they brought in to uh to the base there. And I waited for hours, and I could smell the cinnamon and sugar in the air. And that's what I get on the nose of this maker's. It is just pleasing to the nose. And on the palate, it does not disappoint. Uh, this one is sitting right around 110 proof. So this is where we like it. We like those 110s, 110 plus. Uh, it's got just enough milk chocolate in there, a little bit of espresso, kind of reminds me of that Kacheris coffee a little bit, first thing in the morning. Uh, followed up by that charred oak and that slight, slight, barely there ethanol burn. It's just enough flavor to where it's still, even in this heat, however hot it is, with an 85% humidity, it carries it throughout the day. And I would not normally say that this is perfect for sitting out here on the front porch just enjoying Louisiana weather. But I would do this again, I'll be honest with you.

SPEAKER_00 11:10

I'm with you in that I if I'm outside and I am going to sweat buckets, I usually like to be engaged in some sort of physical activity, not just sitting around and sweating, which is what you get when it's 88 to 89 degrees outside and you've got 85% humidity. I mean, you just you feel like you're getting a shower on your way from the door to the car. But man, this one just sits so beautiful, sweet. And I gotta go back to our typical saying, which is this is bourbon, bourbon-y McBourbon. I mean, when you think about what bourbon should taste like, when you think of that profile, this absolutely hits all the marks from Thornax in Metary. And I mean, just absolutely fantastic. It gives you that beautiful caramel and it's a big caramel, it's just a little sweet, it's sweet enough, and it hits all of those great notes. And you wouldn't think, to your point, that in this weather it would drink as easily as it does. And it's almost like the heat makes it drink a little easier because it does not go down like it's 110 proof. Oh, not at all.

SPEAKER_02 12:11

And I believe it has three of their French staves in there, which it kind of normally doesn't have the clove and all in it, but it makes it pleasant, it makes it pleasing, it gives it that kind of softer appeal that you're looking for in this kind of weather. So, of all days and of all bottles for this to happen with, I'm happy. Absolutely.

SPEAKER_00 12:25

All right, let's go to Renee. Renee, what do you think about this particular offering? This maker's mark from Dornax. Uh, it's called Jackson 327 at 110.4 proof. Absolutely fantastic.

SPEAKER_01 12:38

Uh I'm just glad it's not like 150 proof like y'all normally like to drink. At this, at this proofing, it's perfect for the weather, even though it's a little warm. It's it's not overly heavy. It's got a great flavor to it. The cinnamon hits, uh, and it's going great with the cigars. I mean, it it's perfect.

SPEAKER_00 12:57

Okay, so you guys are teaching me, and for some reason, this cigar, I guess it's just because I talk too much, keeps going out. So I'm gonna have to bum your lighter yet again. But I agree with you, and you know I'm the newbie to cigars here. I am I'm the lightweight on cigars, but I think this cigar pairs really, really well. So, what are we smoking here, Renee?

SPEAKER_01 13:16

Uh this is one of the new Eroa 1916 cigars. Um, Eroa is a family in Honduras that they've been growing tobacco. They're uh they're fourth generation now. And this was this, in fact, this cigar was blended by Santi Eroa, who is the great-grandson of Generoso Eroa, who their first crop was 1916. That's why, that's why they're the 1916. But this is Sante's first cigar he blended with his grandfather, Julio. And it's a great cigar. It's a it's a little above mild, it's more of a mild to medium cigar, a little bit of spice, very little, but with this whiskey, it it pairs great. And I didn't even know what whiskey we were drinking when he said, Hey, we can smoke cigars. I went, I'm going, I'm going get some. I'll be back in a little bit.

SPEAKER_00 14:05

And poof, just like Doug Henning, it's magic. You ended up with all cigars.

SPEAKER_01 14:09

And then, you know, next week we're having uh an event with not next week.

SPEAKER_00 14:13

That event is actually the night that this years on Terrestrial Radio.

SPEAKER_01 14:17

At the shop. Ah, okay. June July 3rd. Oh, there you go. Our rep is coming in with the 1916. Well, all the hero and asylum cigars. So we're gonna do an event there just about all day on the 3rd of July.

SPEAKER_00 14:29

Well, how do people just get tickets just show up?

SPEAKER_01 14:32

I'll just have people do this. You just show up. Okay. And you know, Hector will be there and we'll be talking about the different cigars. They've come out with three new cigars this year. So we'll be featuring all three of their cigars and all the other cigars that they already do. Um, and we'll just have a great time all day.

SPEAKER_00 14:48

Awesome. All right, Jonathan, you will be the last to kind of tell us what you think about this particular makers mark from Dornax at 110.4 proof. Do you think this drinks smoother than you might have anticipated?

unknown 15:00

It does.

SPEAKER_03 15:00

Hold up, there we go. It it does. I'm not typically a makers guy, um, but they did a good job on this pick. Um it's it's mildly sweet. I taste, I do taste some of the cloves and the brown sugar and the spice in it. It's uh it's not hitting much on for me for the nose, but I think the uh deviated septum I got and the 1916 is helping that along the way. But it's a great drink. It's it's I was gonna put it at about 100 proof.

SPEAKER_00 15:27

Yeah, yeah. I I absolutely agree with you that I think this drinks way lower than the actual proof. It is so smooth. It's got legs, it's viscous, it is heavy enough without being too heavy, which is one of the things I really like about it. So, yeah, here we go. There's that term. The mouthfeel on it is actually really good. And I can see this being something that you enjoy either by a campfire or like we are, outside somewhere in Lafayette, Louisiana, in about 138 degrees.

SPEAKER_02 15:57

So you know what's you know what's something interesting about makers with all their different staves and everything else they use is you have well over a thousand combinations of all the staves that they run. So when you get into like a door next pick like this, where they sat down and they said this is what we're looking for, and they can find that exact flavor profile, the chances of you firing this again are slim. They're slim to none. So good on them for coming out with this one. This this one is just impressive.

SPEAKER_03 16:23

And and I'll tell you what, for a uh I'll call it a blind pick of cigar, not knowing what we would drink tonight, it goes really well with this. This is right in my wheelhouse on the cigar level, too. And mild to medium is is my stick. Oh, this is choice.

SPEAKER_00 16:38

Look, I I I have to agree because especially being the novice, one of the things that I think really helps anything, whether it's cigars, whether it's whiskey, is something that a novice can consume and still appreciate, as well as somebody who is experienced, right? Somebody who really has a great palate, who knows, who understands. I think that is a great product to put out there because when everyone can enjoy it, it really says a lot. And I think this maker's mark as well as the cigar really fits there, Renee. Congratulations. You did a fantastic job.

SPEAKER_01 17:09

Thank you.

SPEAKER_00 17:10

All right. So we need to talk about how we rate this whiskey. And we're gonna play for the what would you pay championship belt chain, which Caleb Morse has already done, presented by Box Drop of Lafayette. So for the What Would You Pay Championship Belt Chain, it's just closest to the hole. Whoever comes closest to the actual price. Now, when I love playing this game is when everybody comes in higher than the actual price, because that tells you just how good the liquid is inside the bottle. And for the Morse whiskey rating code, red, I wouldn't drink it even if it was free. Yellow, I would only drink it if it was free. Green, I would buy this. Blue, I would seek this out. Who's got the microphone over there? I don't have eyes in the back of my head. Renee does. Renee, we'll start with you. What would you pay? And where do you rate this on the Morse whiskey rating code?

SPEAKER_01 17:57

Well, I think this whiskey would normally sell for 95, but knowing that it's at Dornax, I think they would do it for 80. And I think it, I'm gonna put it as a blue because it's a very good whiskey, especially with this cigar. All right.

SPEAKER_02 18:14

Caleb, we'll go to you, then we'll go to Jonathan. It's funny you say 95 because that's exactly what I was thinking. Uh, and to me, it's a green. This is just a wonderful, not phenomenal, but a wonderful bottle. It's got all the flavors you search for, it's got the caramel you want, it's got all the things you long for. 110 proof, it hits right where it should. So uh $95 and green. All right. Jonathan, what are you thinking?

SPEAKER_03 18:38

I'm gonna say, I'm gonna say it's a blue. Um, simply because uh, like I said before, I'm not real makers guy, but this one is exceptional to me. Uh it it I I guess maybe y'all turn them into this uh proof hound, like you know, that I think that's your mission uh for everybody who's on the show.

SPEAKER_00 18:55

Oh, it absolutely is, and I could nose hump this glass all night.

SPEAKER_03 18:57

Absolutely. And I'm gonna say it's a steal at 85.

SPEAKER_00 19:01

So we've got 80, 85, and 95 for the what would you pay championship belt chain. So before I give my rating and either lock us up or make sure that Caleb Squirreled, let's go ahead and award the What Would You Pay championship belt chain presented by Box Drop of Lafayette, and that goes to Renee because this is a $69.99 bottle.

SPEAKER_02 19:20

What? I thought for sure I was gonna get to keep it on tonight.

SPEAKER_00 19:23

Nope, you don't get to wear it. We're gonna pass it to Renee during the break. Look, $70 for this bottle to me, this is a steal all day long. I have had so many other bottles at such a higher price that don't come close to this. This is one of those that it's got depth, it's complex, it's got maturity. It's just fantastic. So for 70 bucks, 69.99, I'm in all day long. Now, as far as rating, I think I might have given mine away. Like I said, it is deep, it is complex. It is not quite the Brock's caramel dissolved in alcohol, but it's close. It gives you just enough oak, just enough leather. It's got great viscosity, it sits with a long finish. So for me, this is absolutely a blue. Caleb squirreled, because the liquid in here is something special. And I love when we get to give out blues because we've gotten on a streak, a hot streak. We've been on a good heater, like if we were in Vegas, we we'd gotten away from it. But man, this one puts us right back on task. So that is what we have. We have a blue. We have a what would you pay championship belt chain presented by box drop winner for Renee, who guessed 80 bucks. No, you said 70, Renee? 80. You said 80. Renee said 80, but he was the closest because this is $69.99. Don't miss this one if you're in the New Orleans area. Please go grab it. Enjoy. If you're in the Lafayette area, you're going through New Orleans, stop at Dornacks. Tell them Implicit Bias Radio sent you. We'll come back, start solving the problems of the world, and we are not going to be afraid to talk about the stuff you won't hear anywhere else on this week's episode of Implicit Bias Radio. We are not afraid on this week's episode of Implicit Bias Radio. I'm your host, Gavon Bordelon. Welcome back to the outdoor version of the TSPL. As if you caught the monologue or the last segment, we had to move the show outside because the normal TSPL um had a little bit of a snafu. And those out there who are military know what that stands for. The AC was dead, and we decided to do the show in 80-something degrees instead of 93 degrees inside the TSPL. So, Caleb, I hope you're enjoying being outside. I know Renee is.

SPEAKER_02 21:23

I'm thoroughly enjoying it. I'll tell you, uh, earlier today, someone asked me why I was wearing a long-sleeve shirt, and uh I am regretting my choice.

SPEAKER_01 21:30

Well, you're you're avoiding the UV rays when you're outside like that. Yeah, but the suit makes me look so nice.

SPEAKER_00 21:38

That is Caleb Morse. That is Renee Gerrard. We have Jonathan Brussard with us this week. And look, one of the things that I want to jump into, and Jonathan, I'll let you kind of go ahead and get us started. I have always said we are not afraid on this show. We are willing to give you the stories you are not getting anywhere else. And literally, this story is being covered almost nowhere else, which is the really sad part. So Tulsi Gabbard. For those who follow politics, those who follow what's going on in the world at all, Tulsi Gabbard is no longer employed in Washington, DC. She walked out the door, what, about three, four, or five days ago. But as she did, she made sure she threw an absolute nuke in the building as she walked out. And that nuke is this. She declassified all kinds of documents. And the document specified this that Anthony Fauci was covering up that millions upon millions of dollars of your money was given to companies to create COVID-19, essentially, to create gain of function research on coronaviruses, and a lot of it was done. Take a guess where. Caleb, do you know where a lot of that research was done? Well, it wasn't done in the Ukraine. No, well, well, we don't know that because she did outline that there were hundreds of bio labs in Ukraine that we were funding, but that was a couple weeks ago. This is one specific location. Do you remember the the day? That starts with a we call people around here who get a little crazy a little woo-woo. Maybe they're not so crazy after all.

SPEAKER_01 23:17

China.

SPEAKER_00 23:18

Was it in China? Thank you, Jonathan. It was in China. Do you remember the name of the city by any chance? It sounds a lot like Wu-Wu. Yeah, Wu-Wu-Tang clan or something. Not Wu Tang. Good guess, though. The Wuhan Institute of Virology. Yes, essentially, what we now know, and please don't believe us on this, go look up the documents that Tulsi Gabbard released. Essentially, what we know now is that Anthony Fauci, when he testified in front of Congress, might not have been telling the whole truth. And I only say might because he hasn't been convicted of it. But we know that his testimony contradicts what's in the documents. That is a factual statement. But here's the bigger problem I have with this. The bigger problem with this is, gentlemen, where have you seen this covered in the mainstream media?

SPEAKER_02 24:07

I don't think anywhere has put it out, you know. And and what confuses me about this is someone like Fauci who think what you want about him, he's not an idiot. No. He would have to know that there's documentation, that there are reports, there's all this other stuff that speaks about it, and that it would one day come to light. But is it that he just thinks that we're too stupid to talk about it, that we're too stupid to find it? That's what I don't understand with this.

SPEAKER_01 24:29

Well, and that's and that's one of the problems. You know, when he is the highest paid government civil servant in the United States government, he thinks he's that much better than all of us and that we're too stupid to follow it.

SPEAKER_00 24:43

Well, here, so a couple of fun nuggets out of this. Number one, remember what he always said when he was telling people the protocols that we should be going through for COVID-19? What was his favorite phrase? Was it uh It's it was it was three words and it trust the it was Trust the science or follow the science, trust the science, right? Well, gee, who knew all the science and wasn't telling you the whole story? Well, and who wasn't following the science himself. Oh no, how about this? Who created the science?

SPEAKER_01 25:13

It's not who wasn't following it, who was leading the science. That's a good point, Gavon. He was he was he was inventing the science as we went.

SPEAKER_00 25:21

I think this is the best part about all of this. What we now know, and please again don't believe this, please go look this up. What we now know is that Anthony Fauci was referencing scientific papers that were written by Anthony Fauci's friends with Anthony Fauci paying them to write the papers. So he's saying trust the science when he's controlling the entire narrative of the science that's out there. Jonathan, you I you wanted to chime in on that, I thought.

SPEAKER_03 25:53

Yeah, well, I I'm just uh amazed at um the reporting of the to the bubble in the sky where no one exists that uh we all know about this, right? Um some of the major forces that be in the media just shunning away from disinformation and not notifying the people.

SPEAKER_00 26:13

So let's let's start here. Uh I'm gonna start with where we actually have seen this reported. The only place that I have seen this reported up until probably two days ago. So I don't want you to think that the show is airing and we're telling lies because we record on a Wednesday, the show airs on a Saturday. There is a possibility that someone with one of these stations might actually cover this in the interim. But we saw it on Fox. Fox News did cover this a bit. Yeah, but ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, CNN, none of them covered it.

SPEAKER_02 26:45

Well, and and didn't we see like the same talking points? They had the same script. I know that many, many people have put out their talking points and showed them there were the overlays, the same group of people saying the same thing. So wouldn't that also show us that they were given a script to talk about and that now they they don't want to get caught with their pants down?

SPEAKER_00 27:01

Well, let's let's go a step farther, Caleb, because I think the step farther tells the entire story. Anthony Fauci's first interview, once he was done with the government and could go on a network, right? And really could go out there and could start to be maybe a little more partisan. Do you know what network it was and whose show it was? Because I do. Do you want to take a guess?

SPEAKER_02 27:23

Was it the Colbert report?

SPEAKER_00 27:25

It was not Colbert, because that's actually not news. Damn it. For for those of you out there who think Colbert is news, he wasn't. So it was not news. Jonathan, do you have an idea? Was it the Communist News Network? It was the Communist News Network. So it was CNN. Now the question is, what show was it?

SPEAKER_02 27:42

Oh, I don't know what show was on that channel.

SPEAKER_00 27:44

Oh, does Renee know? I'm guessing Rachel Madcow. It was Rachel Madkow, and here's the best part. The best part is Fauci actually said, You are my favorite show. I've wanted to be here and talk, which tells you everything you need to know about Fauci. If Rachel Mad Cow is his favorite commentator and his favorite show, you know exactly what his leanings are because Madow only leaned to one side of the spectrum. And remember, when Mad Cow was saying, oh, we have Trump's tax returns, when she really didn't, remember all the lies that she told.

SPEAKER_01 28:19

And she gets paid millions of dollars to be on once a week.

SPEAKER_00 28:22

Correct.

SPEAKER_01 28:23

Man, why don't we get that kind of Kavan, you need to talk to our agent. Yeah, yeah, I do. I do.

SPEAKER_00 28:29

But but at the end of the day, this is why you cannot be afraid. You cannot be afraid to change the channel. You cannot be afraid to hear an opposing view. Because if all you did was watch CNN, if all you did was watch ABC, CBS, NBC, you would number one have no idea what Tulsi Gabbard released. And that's what's really frightening.

SPEAKER_03 28:53

Go ahead, Jonathan. I I would also imagine the conversation between uh Rachel Mack Cow and Fauci went like, I always loved your show. By the way, the check is on the way.

SPEAKER_00 29:01

Yeah. Well, we are we are going to get into that in another segment because again, oh, we don't have the bell out here. We'll we'll get the bell out here. And when we start the segment, we will ring the bell. Because, gentlemen, the conspiracy theorists were right again, Renee.

SPEAKER_01 29:16

Plus, the check was already cashed. Well, it it wasn't a it wasn't a theory, it was a conspiracy, and we called that stuff what, four or five years ago? Well, this is the this is I mean, actually, when it was happening, you know, we've been on the air now six years.

SPEAKER_00 29:34

We've been on the air six years. We we went on the air July 11th of 2020. That was our first episode.

SPEAKER_01 29:39

Yep.

SPEAKER_00 29:40

So, yes, Renee, you are that and I hate to say this, but we're not the brightest bulbs in the box. Right? I mean, we are not we are not Wiley Coyote super genius here.

SPEAKER_01 29:55

But we were smart enough to call that.

SPEAKER_00 29:57

Okay, and that's my point, Renee. If normal, everyday people like us can call it, do we really think that the people who are paid to do this, the people who get paid, like you said, millions of dollars to do this, you think they didn't know?

SPEAKER_01 30:14

Obviously, we're smarter than them.

SPEAKER_00 30:16

I don't know if we're smarter than them, maybe we're wiser, or maybe we're just not on the payroll for. Correct.

SPEAKER_02 30:22

That's that's what it comes down to is look, you're gonna, if someone's writing you a check, it's really hard for you to sit there and say, I'm a turn. Especially when that's the person paying your bills, because at the end of the day, like at what point are you willing to risk everything for what you believe in? There were plenty of people out there that say, Well, I would risk it now, I would do this. If it meant that you would lose your house, your job, your family, everything, it's hard.

SPEAKER_00 30:42

Well, just think about the fear that was created with this narrative, Caleb. And I I want to say that the statistic that I saw, this is what I believe. I will tell you, please check me on this. Roughly 15 to 20% of the population said, No, I am not going to be vaccinated with for the COVID vaccine.

SPEAKER_02 31:02

I know people that lost their job because of that. They said, Look, my ideals are not for sale, and they lost great paying jobs.

SPEAKER_00 31:08

But here's the point if you've got 80 to 85% of the population, that fear drove that decision because the media was out there telling them over and over and over and over again. And we're gonna get to maybe why the maybe media did it in another segment. But when you get to that, that fear will make you do all kinds of things. And that's why we can't be afraid. Fear will help you make really poor decisions. Jonathan?

SPEAKER_03 31:33

Uh all I was gonna say is that uh virtuous people are a rare breed nowadays. Um, the Almighty Dada has, you know, overtaken plenty.

SPEAKER_00 31:41

Oh, the great liar has absolutely deceived all kinds of people. And I'd love to say that we're perfect. We're all just trying to be Christian and Catholic on this show. The only perfect one we killed 2,000 years ago, but we've got to at least try.

SPEAKER_02 31:55

And I know a ton of people who got the vaccine who said, you know what, it's worth it for me to get it. I had family that, you know, were suffering and and and dealing with cancer that listened to their doctors, got the vaccine. Uh the VA reached out to me. I've got C O P D as I smoke a cigar and said, Look, you should, you should get vaccinated. And I was like, you know what? This is my first time telling the government, middle finger to you. And uh that was my 100% thought process behind it was I could tell Uncle Sam, no. And that's what I did. I had no desire to get it because of my own personal reasons. And if you got it, look, hey, whatever your reasons were, I hope you weren't lied to.

SPEAKER_00 32:31

And I think that's the big problem, right? The big problem is some people got it out of fear for themselves. Some people got it out of fear for others. Regardless, it was always fear that drove the decision.

SPEAKER_01 32:45

Well, and it some people got it because they were forced to to keep their job.

SPEAKER_00 32:49

Which is another sense of fear.

SPEAKER_01 32:51

Right. Right? You know, I mean, so and I know I personally know people that have have developed all kinds of heart issues in that since that vaccine that they were forced to take. And they have no recourse because part of the deal, you couldn't sue the pharmaceutical companies or the government because of it.

SPEAKER_00 33:07

And Renee, I think that's a a great point, is that it could have been fear of your health. It could have been fear of somebody else's health, it could have been fear of providing for your family because you'd lose your job. I mean, think about all the different layers of fear that were levered on this. And now what we know is that Fauci gave testimony that truly contradicted the facts from his own emails behind the scenes. And if you haven't seen them, please go look them up. And we're gonna continue why the media may not have mentioned it or may not be mentioning it today, and did mention it so many times back then when we come back on this week's episode of Implicit Bias Radio. Stogie's bourbon and implicit bias radio on the porch, because yes, the TSPL is under a bit of technical difficulty right now. So we had to find the new spot. If you're watching on video, you are getting to see the implicit bias crew. We are streaking across Lafayette, Louisiana. Not really, we're not really streaking, but we'd kind of like to because it's hot. But it's fun because we get to smoke stogies and drink whiskey on the porch as we bring you this episode. Okay, so in the last segment, we were talking about the data dump that Tulsi Gabbard released right before she left office, revealing that Anthony Fauci's testimony and Anthony Fauci's own emails completely contradict each other when it comes down to who funded all kinds of stuff when it came down to COVID-19. Oh, way back when we started this show. Okay, so Caleb, you have the bell. Can you do me a favor and ring it, please? All right. Why do we ring the bell, Renee? Oh, you got to have the microphone, Renee.

SPEAKER_01 34:45

This is spoken. Yes.

SPEAKER_00 34:47

Somebody just spoke the truth. Or the conspiracy theorists are correct. Are correct and were correct. So you're asking, what were the conspiracy theorists correct about? Let me go ahead and outline it for you. Everything. Yeah, pretty much everything. Here's the big one. This is the one, Renee, that we called on this show, and I said, mark my words, it has not come out yet. But I guarantee you, in the future, we're gonna figure this out. And Rasmussen Reports now has put it in writing. So we wonder why. Today we are not hearing anything from ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, CNN, Big Networks about the documentation that Tulsi Gabbard released before she left office. We've heard almost nothing from them about this. The question is, why? Well, you know, we made a prediction way back in 2020 that we were gonna find out that somebody was getting paid. As Lewis Pizzolato, the numismatist on this show would say, follow the money. And what Rasmussen Reports has unveiled is that somewhere in the neighborhood, their estimate is 900 million dollars. 900 million dollars was allocated of your money to promote the COVID-19 vaccine on ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, and other stations. Now, here's the thing: we don't have exact numbers. They are not able to discern exactly how much each network got. But at the end of the day, taxpayer dollars were put out there in order to ensure that there was a marketing campaign. It was promoted to go do all these things and to get you to live in fear. So they were promoting the fear-mongering, Renee.

SPEAKER_01 36:41

Well, and if you pay attention, they're still running ads today about COVID vaccines and go get your COVID vaccine and get tested. One difference aren't there billboards for that still up?

SPEAKER_00 36:53

Oh, I think so. One difference, though, and the difference is this a lot of the ads we're seeing today, and this is important so we can be factually correct. A lot of the ads we're seeing today are private dollars from the pharmaceutical companies. Is it some of it? That's why I said a lot of it.

SPEAKER_01 37:08

I didn't say all of it.

SPEAKER_00 37:10

But we are talking specifically about taxpayer public funds. 900 million dollars.

SPEAKER_01 37:18

I mean, back back then they were just the government was trying to get everybody to go and take the vaccine that the vaccine, the pharmaceutical companies were making stupid money on. It didn't cost us anything. You could go get your vaccine for free, but it wasn't free. Our tax money was paying all the pharmaceutical companies for all these vaccines.

SPEAKER_00 37:40

Fed printers go brr with all that money, which is one of the reasons why you wonder why things are maybe a little more difficult economically today. I mean, this is how tied in all of this is. Look at the bourbon and whiskey world, right? Alcohol sales are down. Bourbon, the bubble, for those who don't know, on allocated bourbons, it popped. It popped like the cork on a champagne bottle that got to 110 degrees for two hours. I mean, absolutely the bubble is dead. One of the reasons why, this is our theory, we don't have the facts to back this up, but we have a lot of anecdotal evidence is that so many people had so much money because the government was printing it, they were going out and paying virtually anything for any bottle that might be a good investment, which today isn't, which is why we just drink it, Jonathan.

SPEAKER_03 38:27

Yeah, and and couldn't this have contributed because it happened about the same time where the um the the really high interest rates started to climb and the cost of living got really high. The the influx of money.

SPEAKER_00 38:38

Well, let's talk about the definition of inflation. Anybody know what the definition of inflation is?

SPEAKER_02 38:43

Well, it isn't that whenever there's more money printed in circulation than we can have in the in the reserves, not necessarily not worth what it was.

SPEAKER_00 38:50

So it's too many dollars chasing too few goods. In other words, you have so much money out there that retailers, any store, any business can now say, hey, we want to go capture that. There's so much money out there that it creates artificial demand. That artificial demand does what? It drives up prices. So as prices get driven up and you've got all that money, now when all of a sudden you're not printing it, now all of a sudden you're like, hey, wait a minute. The cost of living is through the roof. But here's where this really ties in. So you wonder why maybe we're not hearing about this information from Tulsi Gabbard today on major news networks. You think those dollars came without strings attached? That 900 million six years ago?

SPEAKER_02 39:31

What do you think? This is Minnesota.

SPEAKER_00 39:34

Ring the bell. That was good, Caleb. Yeah, that was actually very good. Darren lies the point. I'm wondering if some of these dollars and some of these contracts aren't attached. I mean, look, I've worked in newsrooms for those who don't know my history. I worked for a television news station, multiples of them over the course of a decade. And the one thing that always rang true is that the salespeople would almost always, and I've done sales too, the salespeople would almost always make their way to the newsroom and say, hey, we either can or can't run this because our advertisers are keeping us on the air.

SPEAKER_02 40:07

Well, and yeah, so if the government's your largest advertiser, as opposed to putting out sub public service announcements, you know, we want to trust the government. We want to look at it and say, back in the day when they would do those really cool Marine Corps advertisements, like I was I am an Army vet, right? And the Marine Corps advertisements were really unique. They had the really good ones. And some people say their uniform looked the best, but I like the pinks and greens now. Um but when you go through and you had public service announcements about wearing a seat belt, about hey, margarine's better than butter, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. And here we are going back and look 50, 40, 50, 50, 70 years later, we're like, well, the government was wrong. And then with everything coming out that we have coming out as far as information, and every week the government's wrong, the government's wrong, the government's wrong, the government's wrong. So are they just paying for public service announcement or are they in influencing what we're being told?

SPEAKER_00 40:54

Go ahead, Renee, I'll let you go before I jump in because you know my opinion on this.

SPEAKER_01 40:59

The government's constantly influencing what we're thinking. It's part of the control, just like the mask. It was an experiment to see who would listen. The people that didn't wear a mask, the government knew these are going to be the problem children. All the ones that wore masks everywhere, okay, we got these people under control. We know we can have these people do our bidding. The other ones, we're gonna have to watch.

SPEAKER_00 41:26

At the end of the day, Renee, I think that it is a great test run for the government to see how many people are we gonna have to deal with if we tell people to do something that they shouldn't necessarily be doing or that's not good for them, that will just follow us blindly. And by the way, if you're hearing uh background noise, it is because we are we are Alfresco. We are outside today. We are on a porch somewhere in downtown Lafayette that is not the TSPL that is normally presented by Mr. Lester's, which by the way, if you want to get down to Lester's, you've still got time this month because implicit barrel, that 1792 stable barrel that we picked. Well, it's not gonna be much after this episode airs on Saturday because we've got summer supper at Lester's. We're congratulations to Donald Day, he's one of our winners. Congratulations to Kyle Bork, he's one of our winners. They'll be joining the crew, sipping, eating, drinking, having tons of fun, smoking stogies at Mr. Lester Steakhouse. Jonathan, you had wanted to jump in.

SPEAKER_03 42:22

Yeah, um, I I just wonder if the big plan, because wasn't there a previous administration that changed the laws of propaganda on the news? I think we've had that conversation on the show before. Oh, we we have talked about it. There's a name for the law, and I can't remember it, but I do. You remember I'm for sure you do.

SPEAKER_00 42:39

The Smith Munt Act was amended by anybody know which administration? Y'all might remember this one. Barack Hussein Obama's administration amended the Smith Munt Act, which really created a lot of gray area around the the use of propaganda on American citizens. Again, please don't believe us on this. Please go look this up. We beg you, if you disagree with us, if you agree with us, don't take our word for it. Why? Because at the end of the day, if we all learn to look this up and we start reading this stuff and we figure out just how bad it's gotten, maybe we'll all be more informed and maybe, just maybe, we'll all push back just a little bit more. Renee.

SPEAKER_01 43:22

Man, you can tell, Renee. Yeah, I'm telling you. It's you know, they people are are blowing horns for me to speak my my words of wisdom.

SPEAKER_00 43:31

Renee, stop that. We we know that that is just you and the red beans and rice you had for lunch. I'm blowing my own horn.

SPEAKER_01 43:38

Give me a break. Give me a break.

SPEAKER_00 43:42

So, my question to y'all, to the crew, to everybody out there. So, if you're a listener, this is rhetorical. If you're the crew with a K here on Implicit Bias Radio for this episode, here's what I want your thoughts on. If the COVID scenario had this much government money and this Much government influence. How much more of what we think we know is influenced by two, three, four people in the government who were pushing their agenda, not yours?

SPEAKER_01 44:12

And how long has that been going on? You know there's other things that the government has pushed on us that they swore, oh, this is for your betterment. This is no, it was putting money in somebody's pocket, is what it was. It's just crazy. You you can't really trust our government anymore. I don't think you could ever trust our government in the first place.

SPEAKER_02 44:32

I'm about to say trust no government. Yeah, we were told to trust the government, we were told to do this, you know, I'm from the government, I'm here to help, uh, all this other stuff. And at the end of the day, the government's gonna do what the government wants to do because they think that we are cannon fodder, they think that we're sheep that they can slaughter, they think that we're we're part of the machine that they can squeeze every dollar out. And if there's not enough dollars, well, they'll just print more. And if you think the government has your best interest out as an average American citizen, you don't have that much control of the government. Locally, you do, but big government doesn't really care about us as individual people.

SPEAKER_01 45:05

We we are the matrix.

SPEAKER_00 45:08

No, we we are we are not the matrix. We are the cattle, Renee. Yeah, we we are being farmed. I mean, if you think about this, there are people or the product. There are people in the government who look at us with human livestock.

SPEAKER_01 45:19

We are the ones funding all of this. We are the ones giving them the power. Ring ring the bell. We are the matrix.

SPEAKER_00 45:26

Because no, the the matrix is what we live in. The government creates the matrix. We are just the people who live in the matrix and have to see what they want us to see, not the truth, not the red pill, not the real world. Because at the end of the day, Renee, you're proving my point, right? We are the cattle. They look at a human being and say, this person is going to create this much wealth, this much tax revenue, they're going to create this much in whatever, whether it's carbon usage, whatever it might be, they are going to look at that and go, we can count on these people for this. And their primary goal is to keep the cattle in the pen. Because the worst thing that can happen is when one bull breaks through the wire and the rest of the cattle follow. We do not want you to follow anybody away from this show. We want you to stick with implicit bias radio. We will come back, we will have more weekly whiskey, we will have more fun, we will have some great stories, and we're gonna go down some fun rabbit holes as we continue this week's episode of Implicit Bias Radio. Ring the bell, Caleb, in hour two of Implicit Bias Radio, because yes, again, the conspiracy theorists were right. And we have to give credit. I don't know the way they give credit to the virus on this particular topic. You know, Triple H Hold Harmless Harmon. He was the one who actually kind of said, and I'm gonna paraphrase him, quote him as best I can, when he said, Man, it's kind of the little secret in Washington that I always grew up with, which was that foreign money would go overseas to come back. And lo and behold, hold harmless Harmon was right. And my and the best part about this, so for those who don't know, and I'm gonna walk people through this, if you don't have a social media account that goes viral at any time, one of the things you have to understand is this is when something goes viral, it usually goes viral because people interact with the post. And my favorite interactions with that post were people calling us stupid morons, and we may be, but not for that. They literally were saying, You people don't know, you have no idea. And it amazes me how many people literally just aren't intelligent enough for the synapses in their brain to connect the dots. And now we know, thanks to John Solomon, that USAID money was going overseas and coming right back. So let me introduce you to the crew here in hour two. First of all, we'll start with Caleb Morse. Caleb, when you saw this story, were you shocked at all?

SPEAKER_02 47:49

I mean, no. No is the no is the right answer. No is absolutely the right answer. I've seen $100,000 trees in in Iraq. So uh I know that money goes right back to the United States.

SPEAKER_00 48:00

Okay, so hold on. You have to explain $100,000 trees for people.

SPEAKER_02 48:04

Uh well, I mean, date trees, palm trees, I despise them. They're a mess. They're just a pain in the butt. And uh I've seen our government, the U.S. Department of State, pay a local contractor on paper $100,000 per tree to plant it and then $150,000 per tree to remove it later. And they don't get to pocket that money. Do you think any of that money made its way back to the U.S. is the question. Oh, I definitely believe a large sum of that money made it back to the United States in someone else's pocket.

SPEAKER_00 48:34

Well, what's funny is this story is actually going to tie back into the news media here in the U.S. We'll explain that in just a minute. But Jonathan Bruce Art of Industrial Fabrication Services, are you shocked at all that money was going through USAID and then potentially coming back?

SPEAKER_03 48:47

Not in the slightest.

SPEAKER_00 48:49

Not in the slightest. So you ever deal with a government contract, Jonathan? Uh no, I tend to shy away from this.

SPEAKER_02 48:55

It's not worth it. It's not worth it because, you know, everything that comes along with it, the strings that have come along with it, the the eyes and everything else that go with it, it's like, look, do this for us, and then we're going to want something else from you. And they hide it as humanitarian aid. They uh they hide it as military funding because you know what? That's we want to do that. We want to say we're helping people. The soldiers need better equipment. Our soldiers need better. They do what we have, it's really good, but sometimes it's not. And they hide the dollars in everything that we think we're doing right.

SPEAKER_03 49:25

Yeah, I'm never willing to read that heap of paper that'll tell you where this money's actually going to. And you know, I don't want to know. Is Bobby better? I don't know. I just won't get involved with those types of contracts and businesses.

SPEAKER_00 49:38

Here's the really interesting part as we go to Renee and get his opinion. The interesting part to me is this. So, Caleb, I love the way you say $100,000 palm trees, date trees, and then $150 to remove it. That might have been a $20 million contract.

SPEAKER_02 49:52

Oh, I'm sure it was.

SPEAKER_00 49:53

Right? Easily a $20 million contract. A $20 million contract for the government is nothing.

SPEAKER_02 49:59

It's that's a new air conditioner.

SPEAKER_00 50:01

It's a rounding error of a rounding error of a rounding error. In other words, government watchdogs don't look for tens of millions of dollars. They typically look for billions of dollars in order to get nailed for fraud.

SPEAKER_02 50:13

I mean, that's why we have what was it, a hundred uh uh $25,000 coffee cup? Uh yeah. I mean, I mean, $9,000 toilet seats. Yeah, I mean, that's why we have that's why they have that. It's like, look, this is in the budget. We can get it going, this bid will come out, this is what you're gonna code it as, but this is what we're getting.

SPEAKER_00 50:28

Renee, your your thoughts as the certified master tobacconist who's provided the stogies this week. So thank you very much for Renee as we are on the porch.

SPEAKER_01 50:35

Well, you know, there are local people who grow rice in this area that provided sacks of rice to USAID. And I often wonder after these bags were shipped, all of a sudden their rice mill got major, major improvements.

SPEAKER_00 51:00

Look, that's a great call out, Renee, and here's why I say that. Caleb kind of put it together that you never know what strings come with one of those contracts. But you wonder how and why politicians get elected and they go there and they're worth, you know, four or five hundred thousand dollars. And within five years, they've never produced anything, they don't make anything, but they have a company that now all of a sudden is worth $80 million. AKH Ilhan Omar, right? And I mean, her husband, not the brother husband, a different husband, just went from having an audit where he said, Oh, I'm worth 80 million. They said, Oh no, it was an error of accounting. I'm worth $13,000, and that's around number $1.

SPEAKER_01 51:44

Last year they just reported an audit. He made $200 on his winery last year. Ah, yeah, okay. Yeah, they went from multi-millions to that. You know, somebody goes to DC for a $170,000 job, and they're worth millions in about three years. How does that happen?

SPEAKER_02 52:03

I wish I could invest that way.

SPEAKER_00 52:05

Dude, that's saving well. Now, I actually believe that this all really ties into the whining, screaming, crying, complaining, toddler style temper tantrum that Republicans and Democrats alike went through when USAID was shut down. I truly believe that the whole USAID thing, it's why they were all upset, because it was their slush fund in order to, in order to fund their campaigns, in order to fund um, as I quote Joe Biden, we have created the greatest vote harvesting network in the history of or voter fraud network in the history of elections. And that's not an exact quote, but please go look it up. He said something very similar. It was Georgia, wouldn't it? No, it was Joe Biden talking about the 2020 election. Wow. Right before the 2020 election, he said something almost exactly that word for word.

SPEAKER_02 53:06

And people said, Oh, that's just it was a slip. He had a Bidenism.

SPEAKER_00 53:10

Okay, so here's the fun part. These are the same people who said he's sharp as ever. So is he sharp as ever, or was it the truth?

SPEAKER_01 53:16

Well, it's what they said. He might have been very sharp at that moment.

SPEAKER_00 53:20

He might have been too sharp for their liking at that moment, is my point. And John Solomon says that this money was supposed to go to Ukraine, 200 million. This is the reporting from John Solomon. 200 million went to Ukraine and then came back into the U.S.

SPEAKER_01 53:33

Well, look at look at Biden on camera when he was vice president, threatening the Ukraine government that you're going to fire this prosecutor or you don't get your $4 billion. And son of a they did it in four hours. Well, that's a that's so I wonder how much I wonder how much of that money got kicked back to Obama and Biden.

SPEAKER_00 53:56

Well, I I will I will say this of that billion, not much probably got kicked back, but Hunter Biden didn't end up under a Ukrainian jail over it. We know this.

SPEAKER_02 54:05

Come on, wait, it's just the big guy helping him out. That's all.

SPEAKER_00 54:08

Yeah, 10 well, it's only 10% for the big guy. That's it. Right? 10% for the big guy. That's the the text. And please again, don't believe us on this. This is real. Please go look up everything we've just said because it absolutely falls in line with it, Jonathan.

SPEAKER_03 54:22

Anybody who hears a story of money going to Ukraine and it doesn't ring uh a wake-up alarm and you start to put two and two together with all the stories we have of uh Joe Biden and his son uh of money going into Ukraine because of whatever, it it it it should wake up everybody just to take a hard look at it.

SPEAKER_02 54:45

Well, and do you think that's the only country you're doing that with? Oh, yeah. There's a there's a new buzzword that's going around, a new buzz country. That what do you think, or where do you think that money's going? And who's just turned into Mike Pence?

SPEAKER_00 54:55

That fly landed right on your forehead when you were saying it.

SPEAKER_02 54:58

Yeah, yeah. It knew it was like, oh, here it goes. And like, what country might that be today that we're doing the same thing with? They don't change their program. If it works, it works. If you get caught, hey, that happened that one time. Which one, which country is it today? Well, I mean, I would be willing to bet you that it it would be modern-day Israel. I that you know, that's a really And that's that's look, I have not seen any documentation to prove that. But it's a good hypothesis. It's a very good hypothesis in my own mind.

SPEAKER_00 55:23

Well, when you look up what country has received the most foreign aid from the United States since what, 1972?

SPEAKER_02 55:30

And we continue to those are facts. Yep, we touted as look, our government and our Bible tells us to do that. But the country that exists today is not the country that existed 2,000 years ago that we wrote about.

SPEAKER_00 55:39

Now, here's the fun part about the reporting from John Solomon, and this is where it's really interesting. Because this ties back to last hour, which by the way, if you missed any of that, find us on YouTube, on X, on Instagram, find us anywhere you get podcasts, on Apple Podcasts. We now should be on video. Um, we have want to make sure that you have the opportunity to go back and listen, but this is where it ties in. Of that 200 million, according to John Solomon, take a guess where a decent chunk of that money went. It went to United States social media influencers. It went back to the media. In other words, they are relying on creating the matrix to keep you there, to keep public support for their own funding. So imagine I have your money and I can use your money to convince you to send me more of your money. I mean, people get upset about televangelists asking for people's money. This makes televangelists look like saints when it comes down to it. Caleb, you wanted to chime in or Jonathan, whoever wants to go to that.

SPEAKER_03 56:48

Something across the street caught my eye and I'm dying. Uh-uh. Okay, go ahead, Jonathan. Uh are you saying some of this money went back to helping certain people get into certain positions?

SPEAKER_00 56:57

So I don't know that it went back necessarily to possibility. So there there is some reporting that says that the money that went to Ukraine came back to help the Biden campaign. So think about that. Your money, whether you like it or not, was sent to Ukraine.

SPEAKER_02 57:15

Why use their own money whenever they can take it and use your own dollars to their advantage? Now, why use my tools when I can borrow yours?

SPEAKER_00 57:21

And yeah, use yours against you. Here's the really crazy part. This, to me, is what absolutely convinces me that this happened. And it's this. We have had multiple elections in South America since USAID was shut down. What happened in all those elections? What philosophical type of candidate won the presidency or anything like that, the the premiership, whatever it is in the country, what philosophical political spectrum was the candidate on who won since the death of USAID? Uh I would be thinking conservative candidates. Conservative nationalists have won almost every week. Yeah. Correct. In other words, the people who keep saying this is a threat to democracy, it's absolutely the opposite. Shutting down USAID has put democracy back in charge.

SPEAKER_01 58:21

Then explain to me why the socialists are winning so big in the blue control scenarios.

SPEAKER_00 58:28

So if they're running out of money to fund campaigns, Renee, if you were running out of money to try and shut down your competition at other locations around the city of Lafayette, Louisiana, and you no longer had that money from them to shut them down, where would you invest the money you do have? I don't know. In your own business, wouldn't you? You'd make sure that your defenses were shored up on your home turf as opposed to trying to do it in other places. That's my theory.

SPEAKER_02 59:00

You mean that's what's going on in New York right now with all the sweeping people that are voting up there and saying that they need to tax more people, even though more people are running away from that city? They need to tax the rich people. They have to tax them. They take everything they have, and then they have to redistribute it out and give it out to other people. Promises sound great whenever you don't understand English.

SPEAKER_00 59:18

It it goes back to the old saying that is very, very true. Socialism is wonderful until you run out of other people's money. Quote Margaret Thatcher. Yep. I mean, and it's the truth. It is 100% the truth. Socialism worked until you run out of somebody else's money, and then all of a sudden, you're in trouble. And New York, that it's a whole different discussion, but New York is absolutely headed down that path. I mean, they've got all these grand ideas of what they're going to do with everybody else's money. Here's their only problem. In the United States, take a guess what you have the ability to do.

SPEAKER_02 59:51

Move.

SPEAKER_00 59:52

Correct.

SPEAKER_02 59:52

Renee got the word, ring the bell. Look at was it Oregon, uh, where the is it Seattle, where the new mayor up there just had. She was she's on video when they were talking about if you don't like what we have, move, leave. And their largest taxpayer in the city overnight said, deuces. And his multi-billion dollar company that was founded there from his garage, now gone because he doesn't want to pay that stuff.

SPEAKER_01 1:00:19

Look at Governor Hochel. She made that exact statement. If you don't like it here, you're not leave. Yep. And then about, oh, maybe a month or so ago, she was begging people to come back because all those big company taxpayers went to Florida where there is no income tax. Um, the who's the guy? There's a big billionaire in New York right now that's fighting with Mondami. He's trying to tax and he's moving his entire operation.

SPEAKER_02 1:00:48

Mondani was in front of his building saying you don't pay enough.

SPEAKER_01 1:00:50

And he pays a million dollars. Well, guess what? He that guy's moving to Miami. He's moving his whole corporate headquarters to Miami.

SPEAKER_00 1:00:57

And now they're, you know, they're going, uh, uh too late. So this actually funny how last week's show worked, because last week's show, the the theme of last week's show was let evil be evil so it can expose itself. It's exposing itself right now in those cities where people who are like, yeah, we're gonna support this guy because the enemy of my enemy is my friend, and now all of a sudden they're like, wait a minute, the enemy of my enemy has now turned on me.

SPEAKER_02 1:01:23

That's exactly what enemies do. The enemy is not your friend. They do not have your interest at heart, they don't have anything else. When you look at, we were talking about it off-air, the amount of money per taxpayer, right now, debt per taxpayer, $356,000 per taxpayer. I can pull this up. Oh, I have a special app and tell you what it is in the state of New York.

SPEAKER_01 1:01:43

Per taxpayer or per citizen, per person. No, that's per taxpayer. Per citizen.

SPEAKER_02 1:01:48

Per citizen, it is it's a paltry $114,000.

SPEAKER_01 1:01:51

Oh, yeah, but that's including babies and everything else. Yeah. So think about this.

SPEAKER_00 1:01:56

If if you are a young adult out there and you have just had a child, your child might be six months, might be five years old.

SPEAKER_02 1:02:03

Congratulations, by the way.

SPEAKER_00 1:02:04

Yes, number one, congratulations on getting to have fun at least once in your life. Second of all, congratulations on the fact that your child already owes before they can begin thinking about being a productive citizen. Your child, in theory, ow the collective planet, not just the U.S., because our debt is owned by some foreign owners. Your child, because of our politicians, owes the planet $150 plus thousand dollars. And that is while they're at the age they're at now. That doesn't account for where it's about to go.

SPEAKER_01 1:02:38

And that and that doesn't include any student loans.

SPEAKER_00 1:02:41

No, it does not. You know what it also doesn't include? It also doesn't include what they owe the rest of this week's episode of Implicit Bias Radio. We'll be right back. We are not afraid to get the flock out of here on this week's episode of Implicit Bias Radio. So if you're watching on social media, whether it's YouTube X, Instagram, um, Apple Podcasts, yes, we are we are outside for this week's episode of Implicit Bias Radio. We have been able to enjoy fantastic cigars because unfortunately, the AC in the TSPL is dead, like D E D dead. So instead of doing it 92 degree temps inside, we decided to go to the porch where Renee could bring fantastic snowies as the CWAT often provides.

SPEAKER_01 1:03:24

I'm gonna admit to it, I'll sabotage the air conditioner. So we could sit on a porch at some undisclosed location and have cigars and drink whiskey. You know, uh I did that because I just wanted to have a cigar with the whiskey tonight.

SPEAKER_00 1:03:37

Hey, look, the cigars you picked, Renee, they're what? You said that they're 316s is the the name of the cigar.

SPEAKER_01 1:03:43

1916.

SPEAKER_00 1:03:44

1916. Yep, 1916.

SPEAKER_01 1:03:45

I'm thinking stainless steel 316 by the Aroa family.

SPEAKER_00 1:03:49

Okay. All right. And it goes fantastic with this pick from Dornax in Mettery, our New Orleans implicit biased liquor collective partner. This is just a fantastic bottle at $16.99. And in the last at what? I'm sorry, not $16.99, $69.99.

SPEAKER_02 1:04:03

Yeah, I was about to say, good lord. Man, it got it got really affordable.

SPEAKER_00 1:04:06

Yeah, it got really, really spend one diesel driving there. Okay. So I love tying in stories. And before we do, I just have to revisit Mr. Lester Steakhouse at Cypress Bayou Casino, because in hour two, we like to tell our people what you can get and why you can get it there. This has been a fantastic month. It's been kind of a momentous month for us here on Implicit Bias Radio at Mr. Lester's because last November the crew picked a barrel with Mr. Lester's. And that $1792 single barrel is only available for purchase at Mr. Lester's, and you can get your first pour for five bucks, all pours after for 10, or you can just buy the bottle in the restaurant for 50. Renee?

SPEAKER_02 1:04:50

Oh, I thought you had the microphone, Renee. So no, I've had uh no less than probably two dozen text messages from people saying that we are horrible people who should choose every bottle they ever drink for the rest of their life.

SPEAKER_00 1:05:03

I can live with that.

SPEAKER_01 1:05:04

Yeah. I can absolutely live with that. All you got to do is pick it though. You don't have to buy it for them.

SPEAKER_02 1:05:10

Well, you can get expensive. The beauty about this is they can buy it and it's very affordable. Oh, yeah. I mean, try try buying a single bottle, a single barrel or a single uh barrel pick like this anywhere else.

SPEAKER_01 1:05:20

You're not gonna pay with a trick. I'm looking forward to that this weekend. I'm gonna definitely try a glass of that, maybe two.

SPEAKER_00 1:05:27

I'm about to say a glass or ten, Renee. Yeah, well, no, not too. We don't want to send you back in the AV.

SPEAKER_02 1:05:30

No, no, no. My hope three at the most is when we get there, Willie comes out and says, guys, we're out. There's three bottles left. Oh, it would not upset me. No, I wouldn't be I wouldn't be mad at all because at the end of that night, three bottles would not be enough.

SPEAKER_00 1:05:44

And not just that, we love that everybody else gets an opportunity to have it. And that just means that somewhere around 300 to 400 people got a chance to sample what is truly unobtainium at Mr. Lester.

SPEAKER_01 1:06:00

Well, and chances are if this goes off well, which obviously it is, there's a strong possibility it might happen again.

SPEAKER_00 1:06:07

You know what? If I was a betting man, I would put money on there being another pick at some point coming out of Mr.

SPEAKER_02 1:06:13

I can't tell you who said it, but I can tell you uh we were told by someone that this might be the best pick they've ever had of 1792.

SPEAKER_00 1:06:23

Correct. And it was somebody who is very, very close to the company that owns that distillery.

SPEAKER_03 1:06:29

So go ahead, Jonathan. Uh I I know we're talking about bourbon right now, but I I got a question. What is the proper time frame to start purging on the goodies we're gonna eat over there? So, you know, we could feel the AT.

SPEAKER_00 1:06:42

Look, it it all depends on your um digestional capacity. That that works to me would be if you can if you can put away some food, you might kind of do a little binge or a little purge so you can binge when you get there. Midnight tomorrow night's gonna be a good one. Yeah, there you go.

SPEAKER_02 1:06:57

So I start tonight uh with a bottle of magnesium citrate to prepare to make sure I have room. Oh, you starting from the top end. Okay, yeah, yeah. Oh, yeah.

SPEAKER_00 1:07:06

Yep, yeah, yep. Okay, so back to the stories and and how they all kind of tie into one another. We actually said in the last hour, and this is why I brought up if you didn't catch the first hour, go listen. We talked about how, in in a way, we are cattle, we are being farmed. And if you don't believe this, all you need to do is find this story, and this story, man, again, I urge you, please don't believe us, please go look this up. So a lot of people don't know what these things are called. They have seen them. They are in 49 states, and they are in use currently. They are called flock camera systems. Flock camera systems are on the interstates in almost every state in the US. And what they do is they read license plates. They are license plate readers, and as you go by, they are collecting data of what license plate goes by, which means, since they're connected to the government, what other information do they have, gentlemen, if they can read your license plate?

SPEAKER_01 1:08:12

Well, they got your social security number, your driver's license number, your home address, your phone numbers, everything else, because all of that's in the DMV database. And that has been hacked and is already on the dark web in Louisiana.

SPEAKER_00 1:08:26

You would be partially correct. So I'm gonna say you are wrong. Here's the type of information that they can now get. There is a a and add-on to it. I'm about to tell you, it's not even an adapter, it is a simple add-on to a flock camera. And this is what it collects. And if this doesn't frighten you, I don't know what does. When they simply put the add-on onto the camera, it not only collects your license plate, which has all of your DMV information, it then can collect all of the data from every electronic system in your car. And think about what you put in some of these electronics, like this one. Well, so when I say everything that's in your car, I don't mean like just what's on board your vehicle. I mean anything that is inside of your vehicle. So if you have an iPhone, if you have a smartphone, if you have a pacemaker that is connected via Wi-Fi, a credit card that has a chip in it, RFID cards, RFID cards. If you have an Apple Watch, if you have a smartwatch, it collects all the data. So if you think about this, let's start with what they have. They have all of your friends' information, they have your contact information, like so they know who your friends are, it has all the information about what you buy, where you go, where you've been, what you do, because it also has every location you've been because your phone keeps track of that. It knows how fast you're going, it knows where you are traveling from and probably to. Especially if you use a GPS. Correct. And then take a guess what it does. It stores it in a file for later law enforcement usage. Does this not strike anyone as terrifying?

SPEAKER_03 1:10:18

Well, it should be. Big brother. Hold on. Yeah, say that louder, Jonathan. Big brother. Uh, you know, people were concerned years back, I think it was uh Bush Jr. administration about listening into your phone calls. Um and that technology uh at this point where they can get more information through a phone call, which is what this is essentially gonna do.

SPEAKER_02 1:10:40

Not even a phone call, just driving in front of a Well, it's all done under the guise or the fear of national security. Yes. We're gonna gather all this information that way.

SPEAKER_01 1:10:49

If we need it, we have it. See, y'all getting all paranoid for no reason because all of this is a bunch of BS. Because if this was true, when I would get to McDonald's, my order would be ready. And when I would get to the hotel, my room would be ready.

SPEAKER_00 1:11:06

So here's here's what I well, Renee. That'll be the next thing. Renee, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. Okay, so back up a second. Renee, do you not have the app from a couple of major hotel chains where literally you never talk to a person. Oh, yeah. You too. Where literally you check in through your phone, right? You go to the room, it tells you when the room is ready. You don't have to talk to a person, and the key is on your cellular device. Oh, yeah.

SPEAKER_01 1:11:28

I mean, the problem is a lot of times you get there and your room's still not ready.

SPEAKER_00 1:11:33

Well, that's a whole different thing. Here's what here's where I think we can fight back. And this is one of the reasons why I love talking about things like this on implicit bias radio. So, in the state of Louisiana, I have vetted this through attorneys here in Lafayette. In the state of Louisiana, what is your car considered?

SPEAKER_01 1:11:54

An extension of your home.

SPEAKER_00 1:11:56

Say that into the microphone, Renee. You got to grab the mic. An extension of your home. An extension of your home. Are they not technically collecting data from inside of your home if they are collecting data from inside of your vehicle?

SPEAKER_04 1:12:09

Right.

SPEAKER_00 1:12:09

Which means that it is a violation of, and Paul's going, ring the damn bell, Caleb. Is that not a violation of the Fourth Amendment illegal search and seizure? Because they need a warrant in order to collect or get inside of your home. Now, your license plate number on the back of your car is visible because it is on a public road and visible from public access property. But what's inside of your vehicle and that data, I would argue, is an absolute violation of your Fourth Amendment.

SPEAKER_02 1:12:41

And the way they're getting around it is they're saying we're not looking at the data right then and there. Doesn't matter. We're just looking at the combination of data and the devices that are there with you. So even though we're not going through and doing this, it's in the spirit of the law.

SPEAKER_00 1:12:54

Uh, I don't even think it's in the spirit of the law. It's not in the letter of the law. And you know what it's not? It's not going to be in the next segment of Implicit Bias Radio when we come right back. Hour two, segment three of Implicit Bias Radio, which means it is the penultimate segment of this week's episode. I'm Kavan Bordelon, your host. We have a great crew here for you on the porch with yes, we are we are outside because the Mr. Lester's T SPL is the Mr. Lester's outside today, because inside is apparently SOL on AC. So instead of being 92 degrees inside, we're 87 out.

SPEAKER_02 1:13:29

It's slowly cooling off.

SPEAKER_00 1:13:30

It is slowly cooling off. We, and by the way, that is not on Mr. Lester's, that is on my landlord, which I'm on K-I-L-L, my landlord. Right? I'm on C-I-L-L, my landlord, for those who know that joke. Um, or I guess the first thing I needed to do was K-A-L-L call my landlord before I C-I-L-L, my landlord. Yeah. All right. What's that, Renee?

SPEAKER_01 1:13:53

We get to smoke cigars now. We did get to smoke cigars during this week's episode. It is a trade-off.

SPEAKER_00 1:13:58

Um, and I did lose about six pounds out here on the porch. I also get to do my best Barry White in person. Yeah, yeah. You got the pipes to go with it, Jonathan. Love the baby. Yeah. All right. So we're going to shift gears because we always like to have some fun and we always like to go down some fun rabbit holes on the show and not always be so completely serious. But when I tell you you are the product, this story is a natural progression to get us to kind of the last one, which is a little bit deeper of a rabbit hole than the others. But this one, man, it's eye-opening. And I actually did the research on this because I saw the video and said, I've got to look this up. Is this real? And holy balls, it is. I was not aware that up until, oh goodness, you know, maybe a hundred years ago, just right around a hundred years ago in the United States, certainly around the beginning of the US, there was a product that was used to build homes. Now it's not a weight-bearing product. So you had to have a frame. But once you had your frame, you could use this instead of drywall or anything else that did not burn, was a better insulation than pretty much any other insulation that's on the market, that is actually carbon negative. It absorbs carbon dioxide in the chemical reaction over time. And it grows pretty much anywhere and everywhere. And that product is called hemp crete.

SPEAKER_02 1:15:25

We used to have we had presidents that actually grew hemp. Yeah we did. And it we had one of our products made from it.

SPEAKER_01 1:15:30

And I mean, then up until 1938, the Navy used hemp ropes. Yep. They were the major use of hemp. Everybody grew hemp because the government needed the hemp to make ropes with. And the byproduct, which is the fibrous uh husks, yeah. Inside the inside the husk. Inside the plant, the stem of the plant is what they use to make the hemp creek. But you know, the DuPont family couldn't sell nylon rope, so they outlawed hemp along with uh Hearst, who's the major publisher, his paper.

SPEAKER_00 1:16:07

He owned, he owned Forest. So this this is also how this ties in, Renee. So remember we talk about the media has to create the narrative to make you afraid. So what did William Randolph Hearst do with his publishing empire? He started writing terrible stories about the terrible things that hemp can do. And it's one of the reasons why a lot of times people think hemp is marijuana. Far from it. Hemp is not marijuana. It is a what? It's a derivative, it's a cousin.

SPEAKER_01 1:16:33

It's a yeah, it's a very closely related to it. It just doesn't have the THC content.

SPEAKER_02 1:16:38

It's less than, I think, 0.3% THC or something. So like But the plants look almost identical. Yeah, so like if if you have a hemp crete installation in your house, so instead of fiberglass, instead of everything else, they can put hemp crete in there and you can have your hemp crete walls that are fire resistant.

SPEAKER_00 1:16:51

Well, wait, no, you don't even have to have the installation fireproof. Correct.

SPEAKER_02 1:16:54

Yes, it does not burn. So if if there was a fire some somewhere in Lafayette and people ran to your house because they were hoping that your hemp crete would get them high, not gonna happen.

SPEAKER_01 1:17:04

No, no, that's not well, and they've also found uh Egyptian uh paintings in that that are thousands of years old, that they put used the hemp crete as a plaster and it protected all of the the painting.

SPEAKER_00 1:17:21

This is this is essentially one of those ancient recipes that mankind used ad infinitum for thousands of years. Yeah, that someone in power, actually three people, the Hearsts, um the DuPonts, and one other family, and they said, Oh, no, no, no, no, this gets in the way of us making money. So we're gonna go pay to get this outlawed, and they got it through to make it outlawed. When at the end of the day, this stuff, I mean, this is what this is the recipe. Don't say, hey, we heard this on implicit bias, so we were trying it. But it's like the fibrous inside of the hemp plant, it is lime and water. That's it. And you mix it together and over time it calcifies. That's why it is carbon negative, because the chemical reaction takes the carbon dioxide and it calcifies the lime and the hemp and turns it basically backwards into stone.

SPEAKER_02 1:18:12

Well, and then, like, look, South Louisiana, it insulates better than what we have. Yep. It resists mold because it breathes.

SPEAKER_00 1:18:19

That's the other thing. It is insect and mold. It's not even resistant, it is proof. Rodents insect and mold proof. Think about the black mold problem in southern Louisiana and what hempcrete would have done to that.

SPEAKER_02 1:18:32

Rodents don't like it. So if you're next to a sugar cane field, when they harvest it, guess what's not going to run into your house? And depending on if you do in bedrooms, what you're supposed to do in bedrooms, bound took a wow, wow. It insulates sound as well. Like it just sounds like it's the perfect product that we've been neglecting. Definitely a benefit for snoring, right?

SPEAKER_03 1:18:48

Is that that's what you're talking about, right? That's basically corrupted by three people, right? That two of them y'all y'all mentioned. I don't remember the third person, but if I'm not mistaken, it was a government official.

SPEAKER_00 1:18:58

It was, right? It was somebody they all owned forest land, or they owned a wood product company, or they owned the media company. That was first step owned on. So, I mean, these are the powers that be. And when you start looking at this stuff, they still use it in Europe today, which is the really crazy part. We can't use it in the well, I let me rephrase that. The current administration has pulled back some of those regulations and guidelines. You can now use hempcrete as a building material in the U.S., but we're having to rediscover technology that Europe never outlawed in the first place. And I'm not one to typically say Europe got it right and we didn't. Europe has had this right.

SPEAKER_03 1:19:35

Well, if there's something simple. And if I'm correct, the same Europe has a big surge in reintroducing this into uh buildings and well, what we're finding is that our ancestors were right.

SPEAKER_02 1:19:47

People are going back to farming and harvesting their own vegetables and food. They're going back to more natural ways of harvesting their own game and growing their own animals because everything you get from the store is full of uh steroids and everything else. So we're going back to more natural ways to do it. And when you look at hemp, hemp can grow up to 15 feet in like three or four months.

SPEAKER_00 1:20:06

So when you want to talk about sustainability, it grows quickly, yes. And it grows almost anywhere. You can grow it on almost any type of soil, any terrain, any climate. It it grows. It reminds me of this, and this is what it always brings me back to because I've seen this summed up in a movie line. And I'm amazed they let them put it in the movie. It was when they redid Casino Royale, right? Daniel Craig, and he meets the he meets the new Q. And they are looking at a picture of an old ship. Uh-huh. And the new Q is alluding that the ship is the old intelligence agent being brought back into harbor and being put on dry dock because it's too old. And he says, Well, age is no guarantee of experience. And Bond looks at him and says, And youth is no guarantee of a new idea. That or innovation, that in and of itself is what this whole story is about. But you know what? We have to innovate a bit because we've only got one more segment. We got the one-minute finger. We'll come back with this week's final segment of Implicit Bias Radio right after this. Final segment of this week's episode of Implicit Bias Radio. I'm your host, Kavon Bordelon, and welcome in to a very special episode. Those watching on video know that yes, we are dining al fresco for this week's episode because we are not afraid to go outside when the AC is out inside. So this is the Mr. Lester's TSPL Alfresco, I guess. We've got Caleb Morse, the Rust of Renegade, your co-host. We've got Renee Girard, the certified wizard of tobacco, who provided and somehow miraculously just made cigars appear. And then we've got Jonathan Broussard of Industrial Fabrication Services with us. It's a great crew with a K here this week on Implicit Bias Radio. So, you know, we're talking about things that we rediscovered. We rediscovered Hemp Crete in the last segment. And now I'm wondering, because you're starting to see videos on social media about people who believe that they are rediscovering things inside of the Grand Canyon. So, Renee, Jonathan, I'm curious, had either of you heard the theory or the stories of people who have found treasures inside of caves in the Grand Canyon, and the treasures in the Grand Canyon look like they are Egyptian? Have either of y'all heard or seen this? Before this week? No. Before this week, no.

SPEAKER_02 1:22:26

Not one bit. You hadn't gone down the rabbit hole that the promised land was here in the United States and the Bible took place here?

SPEAKER_03 1:22:32

Well, you know, I always heard we were the promised land, but not in that aspect. It it ties in.

SPEAKER_01 1:22:37

It's really Well, I mean, that's what the Mormons always believed. Correct. But, you know, uh I know there are a lot of the Indian Native American tribes, which always got a misunderstanding of Native Americans. Why are they Native Americans when they came over from Asia on the land bridge? Allegedly. No, you look, dude, look at look at the Indians and Mongol people. They look identical.

SPEAKER_02 1:23:04

This is fair. They they came over here. You mean they're the original people that weren't crossbred with Genghis Khan?

SPEAKER_01 1:23:10

Yeah, they're the ones that escaped. Okay. So let's let's let's pull back from it.

SPEAKER_00 1:23:16

Let's pull back from that. But there are stories.

SPEAKER_01 1:23:18

You wanted to go down a rabbit hole.

SPEAKER_00 1:23:19

There are stories. Well, but this is the rabbit hole I wanted to go down.

SPEAKER_02 1:23:22

The original story is back for Renee's birth year in 1909. Correct. Yes, yes.

SPEAKER_00 1:23:26

Oh God, Renee was like 147 back then.

SPEAKER_02 1:23:29

So and there was a the Arizona Gazette published an article uh that talked about how they found at the Grand Canyon, in the Grand Canyon, sorry.

SPEAKER_00 1:23:37

In caves, in the Grand Canyon, which by the way, there are large swaths of the Grand Canyon that you are not supposed to have access to today. Why is that? Well, that's government owned land. Oh, okay. You know, with the government. Which means the public owns it.

SPEAKER_02 1:23:49

When the government wants to protect something, it says that we can't there.

SPEAKER_00 1:23:52

So back to the Arizona Gazette. They publish an article.

SPEAKER_02 1:23:54

Yeah. So in the article, they said they found hundreds of rooms with Egyptian-type statues, with mummies, with copper weapons in them, with hieroglyphs on the wall, uh, large uh seated figures resembling Buddha, everything else. Gold treasures. Yeah, gold treasures, everything else. Uh typically like underground pyramids, that kind of thing, with this very similar architecture and structure to Egypt. And when the article came out, they talked about it. And then guess who got in put in charge of this excavation? USAID.

SPEAKER_04 1:24:24

Close.

SPEAKER_02 1:24:26

The Smithsonian. Yes. And then all of a sudden everything was off limits, and then it went nowhere. We got no more articles, we got no more information, we had no more intelligence, and it just went quiet.

SPEAKER_00 1:24:36

And instead of it just going quiet, it not only went quiet, it went quiet, and then access became restricted.

SPEAKER_02 1:24:43

Yes. They locked everything down, no more information was put out to U.S. citizens. It just was like, hey, this article was written, a few people talked about it, and then poof, Kaiser Sose.

SPEAKER_03 1:24:52

It's the Colorado River that runs through the Grand Citizen. Correct. And so now it's kind of making a little bit sense why you need a permit to be able to uh travel down there, whether it be kayak boat or whatever. And then and if I'm not mistaken, you confined to certain areas you can and can't view or stop along the way.

SPEAKER_02 1:25:12

Less than 5% of the people that visit the Grand Canyon ever leave the rim. Like we went there, it's massive. Uh the average width is 18 miles wide. It's 270-something miles long.

SPEAKER_01 1:25:24

I mean, I've I've I've flown the colour. Go ahead, hold on, Renee.

SPEAKER_02 1:25:27

There's a microphone that's gonna come on at some point.

SPEAKER_01 1:25:29

I've I've flown over to Grand Canyon. Yeah, it's immense. But you know what? The aliens needed someplace to put all their stuff that they got from Egypt. You know, and nobody was in the Grand Canyon at the time. So that would be a good storage facility for them. So hold on. And Roswell is not that far from there.

SPEAKER_00 1:25:45

Now, there you're you are correct about Roswell not being that far, but here's maybe another theory to kind of walk through. If you look at history, there is obviously a progression of human intelligence, understanding of the world around us, of technology that all of a sudden gets lost. And we call that loss the Dark Ages. Right? We went from the Greeks having this, you know, allegedly utopian philosophical society to becoming feudal lands that are medieval, and all of a sudden we lost all the technology the Greeks had, the buildings, the whole nine yards, to then have a renaissance in the 1400s. What actually makes more sense to me is that you had way more technology than we maybe admit today. And then you had a cataclysmic event. And that cataclysmic event took out a lot of people and a lot of the knowledge with those people. That makes sense. And it almost makes sense. I mean, look, when you go and read, well, the United States was actually the original Garden of Eden, when you look at the description of the river in the Garden of Eden, it almost sounds a lot like the Mississippi. Right. I mean, when you start thinking about the land of Egypt that's described in the Bible, it's very, very similar to what you would expect to find in Arizona and the Grand Canyon. I mean, there's a lot of similarities. And I'm not saying this is the case. What I'm saying is there's a lot of questions that need to be asked, and you've got a lot of people now that are trying to go into those places, and these videos are popping up on social media. And this is like the Wookiee defense. It does not make sense.

SPEAKER_02 1:27:21

Well, yeah, and you would expect someone to come out and start talking about it and saying, hey, we found this because the Smithsonian was supposedly involved with it. But yet nothing came out afterwards. You know, we look back at the city of Troy. Troy was thought that it didn't exist until all of a sudden someone found it and governments started acknowledging it. They thought it was a legend. Yep. Uh in the Bible, it talks about the city of Hittite, right? The city of Hittite didn't exist until until they found it. All of a sudden they found it.

SPEAKER_01 1:27:43

Yeah, but everybody knows that Troy's in Alabama.

SPEAKER_00 1:27:46

No, that's a university, not the city. Yeah, it is a city.

SPEAKER_01 1:27:49

Oh, there's a city as well. You're thinking of Rome, Georgia.

SPEAKER_00 1:27:51

I was about to say there is Rome, Georgia as well. But when you go through all of this, at the end of the day, you wonder, especially, so think about Hemp Creek, think about us being the product, think about us being farmed. How much has a ruling class used fear to farm the people of this planet?

SPEAKER_01 1:28:11

Oh, God. Go ahead, Lene. Governments have done that forever, not just our government. You go back millennia. I mean, the Roman Empire, uh, all of that. They they would to gain power, they would strike fear in their people so they could gain power, and the ones that resisted, the people with knowledge that resisted, disappeared. Which makes sense. So guess what? That knowledge disappeared also.

SPEAKER_00 1:28:38

Which makes sense to me why the United States of America for the last 200 years has had a massive target on its back. And here's why. Because the government of the United States of America was the first and only government in the history of mankind to found itself on the inalienable rights of the citizenry which gives the government power, not a deity that gives the government power, not the government because of Almighty Force giving the government power, but the government deriving its power of and from the people. If this idea were to take root across the planet, any ruling elite, I don't care if you believe that there's a cabal or not, anyone who aspires and has the ambition to be that ruling elite now all of a sudden has a target on their back because there are way more of us than there are of them. And at the end of the day, that's what they fear. They fear you. They fear us because if they can't control us, they can no longer continue to put fear in our hearts, to put fear in our lives, and to keep us from expressing our implicit bias. Thanks for joining us this week. Go find our implicit bias liquor collective partners. Grab yourself a great weekly whiskey, and we'll see you in seven. Cheers.